Let’s create awareness for all the benefits that nuclear technology brings to mankind

Published by mzconsultng on

When a report on the benefits of nuclear technology starts with “The public are often unaware of the extent to which aspects of their everyday life involve products and processes originated from the application of nuclear technology via the nuclear industry”, it tells me that the time has come to tell this story and increase public awareness.

medical1

I had the opportunity to attend the Nuclear Industry Summit in Washington last month and was privileged to participate in Working Group 3 which had the mandate to summarize the role of the nuclear industry globally.  The NIS was a very successful event.  It was a companion event to the Nuclear Security Summit held by President Obama and provided an opportunity for the nuclear industry to interact and present its views to global leaders on the key issues of nuclear security and how the industry addresses it.

With the 5th anniversary of Fukushima having just passed last month and the 30th anniversary of Chernobyl this month, we have a steady reminder of the issues that never seem to go away for the nuclear industry.  It is our nature.  In his very enjoyable talk to the Canadian Nuclear Industry Conference in February, Malcolm Grimston asks the key question of why is it that the safest source of large scale electricity generation we have ever come up with is considered so dangerous by enough people that in a number of countries there is an effort to stop using nuclear energy?  I have commented on Malcolm’s presentations before and I really enjoy his perspective.  We in the industry tend towards the problem being an irrational public – Malcolm insists the public are quite rational and that it is actually the industry that is providing much of the information that frames public views.  An example is the constant talk by the industry about safety and how safety is the most important issue.  While intended to provide comfort, it can achieve quite the opposite effect.  If safety is even more important than generating electricity reliably and efficiently the answer is quite simple – shut down the plants and safety is assured.  I won’t go into more detail but I do recommend you watch Malcom’s presentation when you have 25 minutes to spare.

Or as was so eloquently put by the CEO of Ontario Power Generation at the CNA conference when talking about the nuclear industry, “we make sure to find the black cloud around every silver lining left to our own devices.”  Yes, we in the industry often succumb to the narrative and as Malcom suggests, probably even feed the beast. (Aside:  I also urge you to watch Jeff Lyash’s presentation when you have 20 minutes to spare.  It is an excellent view of the industry going forward.)

So rather than talk about safety and nuclear waste as we tend to do over and over again; in this post I want to help increase awareness of the many benefits that nuclear technology brings to us all across a range of industries.  The paper submitted by Working Group 3 led by Dr. John Barrett, President of the CNA is a must read.  It is one of those papers that once read makes you wonder; why hasn’t this paper been written this way before?  So please read the paper – it is about 20 pages and well worth it.

But for those who may not get there quickly enough here is a summary of the benefits that nuclear technology brings to society each and every day.  As stated in the paper, “Nuclear technology is vital for more than just providing reliable, low-carbon energy. It also has life-saving medical application; improves manufacturing, mining, transport and agriculture; and help us discover more about the planet we live on and how we can sustainably live with it.

So for example, did you know that

  • nuclear technology saves lives through use of radioisotopes for screening, diagnosis and therapy of various medical conditions? According to the WNA, over 10,000 hospitals worldwide use radioisotopes. Radioisotopes are used in therapy to control and damage cancerous growths. Iodine-131 is used to treat thyroid cancer; Phosophorus-32 to treat leukemia.  Nuclear techniques are used for neonatal screening for sickle cell disease, hypothyroidism and cystic fibrosis, as well as childhood cancers.
  • radiation is used to preserve seeds and food products and breed disease-resistant plants. In plant breeding, some 1800 new crop varieties have been developed through mutation induced by ionising radiation.
  • irradiation technology is increasingly being used to preserve food – spices, grains, fruit, vegetables and meat. It avoids the use of potentially harmful chemical fumigants and insecticides
  • use of the IAEA’s Sterile Insect Technique irradiates the eggs of these insects to sterilise them before hatching. The IAEA estimates that, by suppressing insect pest populations with SIT, pesticide use worldwide has been reduced by 600,000 litres annually.
  • in industrial radiography, nuclear substances are used for the non-destructive examination and testing of new materials. Radiation from the substances passes through the material and allows defects in welds or constituency to be recorded on film or a digital imager.

This list does not do justice to the report itself which I strongly suggest you read.  It’s time to stop being on the defensive and make sure that we no longer have to write reports that start with “The public are often unaware of the extent to which aspects of their everyday life involve products and processes originated from the application of nuclear technology via the nuclear industry.”  It is time to celebrate our successes and not just talk about where we need to improve.  We are proud to be part of the nuclear industry and we are confident that we are making a difference that helps to make the world a better place.

image_pdfimage_print

6 Comments

Geoff Mitchell · April 25, 2016 at 8:30 pm

Great approach. Much the same as Alex Epstein’s The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels” that the fossil fuel industry is starting to use with “the leave it in the ground” crowd.

rennie caplan · April 26, 2016 at 7:45 am

great reminder how nuclear energy has helped us in medical approach
good lesson learned

Philip D'Angelo · April 26, 2016 at 11:10 am

An additional benefit for the “Did you Know List” is the technical education, training and advanced skill development of the next generation of technologist that will seed future technical developments with people that “can do” based on tested “Know-how”. America is losing its technological edge and the next generation is being trained to depend on Government to solve their problems and determine their future. Designing, building and operating nuclear facilities provides opportunities for those willing to challenge themselves to go beyond their comfort zone, accept responsibility and contribute through personal effort to shape the future of mankind.

Roy Davis · April 26, 2016 at 1:43 pm

Very interesting article. However, there are a number of issues the nuclear industry needs to address if it is going to stand any chance of changing the public’s negative perception of nuclear power.
1. We have to stop being apologetic! All power generation involves managed risk. Do you hear or see the coal industry or the oil industry apologizing for the mess they make, the pollution, or the deaths associated with coal mining or lung disease? No way, Jose!!
2. We need to be proactive and aggressive. We are extremely poor communicators. I could say we are frightened of our own shadow but that is pretty self-evident. Start shouting the positives from the roof tops! Take the initiative! grab the bull by the horns and be proud of our achievements and how they have improved our standard of living. I always tell people if they want to get rid of the nuclear power plants in the US, then get ready for no power every fifth day. That’s what nuclear power provides us. We all use it but nobody is aware that every firth time they switch on a light it’s powered by electricity from a nuclear plant.
3. We are way too technical in our explanations. Use the KISS principal and make it easy to understand. The statistics speak for themselves. Be pragmatic; if we got rid of nuclear energy, what would we replace it with?? It is the only “clean,” volume producer of energy. If we remove it then our economies go down the toilet (check out Japan), if we wait for a “new” solution, our economies and our planet go down the toilet, if we stop building nuclear plants, yes, our economies tank. It may not be perfect but it does the job and and the risk is totally manageable. Be honest and tell the public the truth – there is a risk, albeit minuscule, and even if there is an incident it can be contained because that’s the way we design the plants. The newest technology and designs have the highest safety margins (by a mile) than any other form of energy production. In fact they have the highest safety standards, period!!
4. Have a united voice and build a team with the disciplines necessary to tell the story. Our industry is full of techies trying to tell a very complex story to a very broad audience who are skeptical in the first place. Blinding them with science is the worst approach possible. It smacks of pulling the wool over their eyes. FACT: nuclear power is the only power source capable of bridging the gap between fossil fuels and low-carbon solutions. THE ONLY SOLUTION!! It may not be perceived as perfect but it is better than the alternatives BY A MILE!! So, the worse case scenario is that nuclear energy is a necessary evil and best case is it is the safest, cheapest and cleanest solution on the planet (so far).
5. We are disorganized and weak. Who speaks for the industry? Who speaks for the power generators or the mining companies?? Who speaks for the manufacturers of plant and machinery? It’s every man/woman for themselves. What is the message or messages they are presenting? We need an industry body that speaks for all interested parties and prepares a cogent, coordinated argument that doesn’t hide the truth and focuses on the positives – and there are plenty of them!!
All of the articles, like the one above, are great but they need to be part of a bigger marketing strategy that the industry buys into.
6. Nobody spends any money on changing attitudes or influencing perceptions. There is no central organization that can raise the funds necessary to undertake a massive marketing campaign for the industry and very few qualified people in the industry to oversee it.

Basically we need to get our act together or nothing will change and nuclear power generation will continue to be the pariah it currently is and investment/growth will be extremely difficult to achieve. Organize and proactively attack our competitors the way they attack us!!

Let’s create awareness for all the benefits that nuclear technology brings to mankind | tony thain · May 12, 2016 at 3:03 pm

[…] Article on focusing on the benefits of nuclear technology rather than trying to convince the public of nuclear safety. […]

Comments are closed.